This article covers strategies for keeping your documentation accurate and valuable over time, from automated checks to content lifecycles.

Automate what you can

Documentation rot happens when you rely too much on manual effort to update content.

Try to introduce automations where you can, such as:

  • Track stale content: Run a script to flag important docs that haven’t been updated in X days.
  • Detect product changes: If your documentation relies on artifacts from engineering (e.g., OpenAPI specs), set up a job to detect when key objects change and notify the team. Or, use a documentation provider that auto-generates APIs and automatically updates.
  • Enforce standards with linters: Use Vale.sh or a documentation provider to automatically catch formatting issues, writing style deviations, or missing metadata on every pull request.

Set up realistic review processes

Documentation will never be perfect, and that’s okay. You should have a threshold of acceptance—a level where docs are functional and useful.

Instead of aiming for 100%, balance efficiency with quality:

  • Trigger reviews based on relevance, not just time. Rather than setting periodic updates, prioritize content based on usage, search demand, or product changes.
  • Focus on high-impact docs. Not every page needs regular updates, but the 10 most viewed pages for users should get extra attention.
  • Lean on your community. If your docs are open-source, empower users to flag issues or submit fixes via pull requests—it builds trust and keeps content fresh. Incorporate feedback mechanisms in your docs when you can.

Know when to rewrite

Over time, documentation naturally accumulates caveats and workarounds, leading to “spaghetti docs.” When incremental fixes create more confusion than clarity, a full overhaul may be the best option.

  • Plan for periodic resets. Every 1-2 years, consider a major cleanup, especially if best practices or the product itself has evolved significantly.
  • Start with a structured audit. Interview support teams, analyze user feedback, and document what’s missing, misleading, or redundant before rewriting.
  • Tackle rewrites in focused sprints. A full overhaul doesn’t have to happen all at once—prioritize sections with the biggest impact.

Wrong docs can be worse than no docs

Outdated or misleading documentation wastes users’ time and erodes trust. In cases where a doc is completely inaccurate and unfixable in the short term, it’s often better to remove it entirely. Users will appreciate having less information over having wrong information.