Screenpipe vs Limitless
Limitless is the new name for Rewind.ai. This comparison covers the current Limitless product.
Overview
Limitless focuses on meeting transcription and AI memory, while screenpipe provides comprehensive screen and audio capture with full developer access.Core Philosophy
screenpipe:- Open source and transparent
- Local-first, privacy-focused
- Developer-friendly with full API
- Cross-platform from day one
- Proprietary, closed source
- Cloud-dependent
- Consumer-focused experience
- Limited platform support
Key Differences
Screen Capture Approach
screenpipe:- Multi-monitor: Captures all connected monitors
- Event-driven: Only captures when something changes
- Storage efficient: ~5-10 GB per month
- Full context: Entire screen estate captured
- Single window: Active window only
- Continuous: Always recording
- Higher storage: More disk space needed
- Limited context: Misses background activity
Audio & Meeting Features
screenpipe:- System audio (what you hear)
- Microphone input (what you say)
- Local Whisper transcription
- Works with any app (Zoom, Meet, Teams, Slack)
- Speaker identification
- Offline capable
- Meeting transcription focus
- Cloud-based processing
- Integrated calendar features
- Meeting summaries
- Requires internet connection
Privacy & Data Control
| Aspect | screenpipe | Limitless |
|---|---|---|
| Source code | ✅ Open (MIT) | ❌ Closed |
| Data storage | 100% local | Cloud required |
| AI processing | Local or cloud (your choice) | Cloud only |
| Account required | No | Yes |
| Data export | Full export via API | Limited |
| Self-hosting | Possible | Not available |
Developer & Integration Features
screenpipe:- ✅ Full REST API
- ✅ JavaScript/TypeScript SDK
- ✅ MCP server (Claude, Cursor, Cline)
- ✅ Plugin system (Pipes - AI agents)
- ✅ Raw SQL access
- ✅ Webhook support
- ✅ Open integration ecosystem
- ❌ Limited API (closed beta)
- ❌ No SDK
- ❌ No plugin system
- ❌ Proprietary integrations only
Platform Support
screenpipe:- ✅ macOS (Apple Silicon)
- ✅ macOS (Intel)
- ✅ Windows 10/11
- ✅ Linux
- ✅ macOS
- ✅ Windows
- ❌ Linux
AI Model Flexibility
screenpipe:- Use any AI model
- Local AI via Ollama (Llama, Mistral, etc.)
- Cloud AI (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini)
- Custom fine-tuned models
- Switch models anytime
- Proprietary AI models
- No model choice
- Vendor lock-in
Team & Enterprise Features
screenpipe Teams:- Central config management
- Shared AI pipes (workflows)
- Per-pipe data permissions (YAML-based)
- Employees’ data stays on their devices
- MDM deployment (Intune, SCCM)
- Admin dashboard
- Privacy boundaries
- Limited team features
- Data centralized in cloud
- No granular permissions
With screenpipe Teams, admins control what gets captured and what AI can access, but the actual data never leaves employee devices - providing both control and privacy.
Feature Comparison Table
| Feature | screenpipe | Limitless |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | ||
| Open source | ✅ MIT | ❌ Closed |
| Local-first | ✅ | ❌ |
| Capture | ||
| Multi-monitor | ✅ All | ❌ Active only |
| Event-driven | ✅ | ❌ |
| Audio transcription | ✅ Local | ✅ Cloud |
| Offline mode | ✅ | ❌ |
| Developer | ||
| Full API | ✅ | Limited |
| SDK | ✅ | ❌ |
| MCP server | ✅ | ❌ |
| Plugins | ✅ Pipes | ❌ |
| Raw data access | ✅ SQL | ❌ |
| AI | ||
| Model choice | ✅ Any | ❌ Proprietary |
| Local AI | ✅ Ollama | ❌ |
| Platform | ||
| macOS | ✅ | ✅ |
| Windows | ✅ | ✅ |
| Linux | ✅ | ❌ |
| Teams | ||
| Central config | ✅ | ❌ |
| Data permissions | ✅ Per-pipe | ❌ |
| On-device storage | ✅ | ❌ |
| Pricing | ||
| One-time option | ✅ $400 | ❌ |
| Subscription | Optional $39/mo | Required |
Pricing Comparison
screenpipe:- Lifetime: $400 one-time - all features forever
- Pro (optional): $39/month - cloud sync, priority support
- Teams: Custom pricing
- No lock-in, no recurring costs required
- Monthly subscription required (pricing varies)
- No one-time purchase option
- Ongoing costs mandatory for access
Use Cases
Choose screenpipe if you:
- Need multi-monitor support
- Want full control over your data
- Require API access for integrations
- Build custom automations
- Prefer local AI processing
- Want open source transparency
- Need team deployment with granular permissions
- Prefer one-time purchase over subscription
- Use Linux
Consider Limitless if you:
- Only need active window capture
- Prefer fully managed cloud solution
- Don’t need developer features
- Want zero-setup experience
- Focus primarily on meeting transcription
- Comfortable with subscription model
- Don’t need multi-monitor support
Migration from Limitless
If you’re considering switching from Limitless to screenpipe:- Export your data from Limitless (if available)
- Install screenpipe from screenpi.pe/onboarding
- Configure capture settings for your monitors and audio
- Set up AI integrations using your preferred model (Ollama, OpenAI, etc.)
- Explore Pipes to replicate any workflows you had
Ready to try screenpipe? Download the app · View documentation · Join Discord